http://hbr.org/2013/09/understand-the-perils-of-co-creation/ar/1
The rise of social media has generated tremendous opportunities for companies to engage with customers. Many allow customers to participate in value-creating activities, such as brainstorming advertising taglines or product ideas—a process often referred to as co-creation. These activities not only help companies innovate at low cost but also engage customers—every marketer’s dream.
In practice, however, these programs are hard to run. Some customers “hijack” them—instead of offering real ideas, they seize the chance to ridicule the company. Such hijacking is one of the biggest challenges companies face. Prior research suggests that about half of co-creation campaigns fail.
Consider Henkel, a large German manufacturer of detergent and other products. It ran a contest in which customers could submit innovative packaging suggestions—and was deluged with negative ideas. (One was a label describing the detergent as “Yummi Chicken Flavor.”) General Motors invited customers to tweak its advertisements, resulting in a rash of ads criticizing its SUVs as gas-guzzlers that contribute to global warming. McDonald’s set up a Twitter campaign to promote positive word of mouth, but the effort became a platform for consumers looking to bash the chain (see examples below).
When Tweets Attack
Managers considering co-creation initiatives should think carefully about the risks. Our research identifies three areas of particular concern:
Strong brand reputation. Firms with strong brands need to protect them—they have a lot to lose. They must be aware that these initiatives give customers opportunities to tarnish the brand. Strong brand reputations are generally built through consistent, effective marketing, and companies should weigh the potential for misbehaving customers to undo their careful efforts.
High demand uncertainty. Companies are more likely to ask for customer input when market conditions are shifting. But this frequently backfires when demand is highly uncertain, because customers in fast-changing markets often don’t know what they want or what they’ll like. Porsche got lots of negative feedback when it announced plans to release an SUV, but it proceeded anyway, and the Porsche Cayenne was a great success.
Too many initiatives. Companies ordinarily benefit from working repeatedly with the same suppliers, but that doesn’t hold when the “suppliers” are customers. Experience shows that the quality, quantity, and variety of input decrease as the frequency of engagement increases. A study of the Dell IdeaStorm program (in which customers were invited to submit product or service ideas) found that people submitted ideas repeatedly—including many for things the company was already offering. And customers whose ideas were implemented tended to return with additional ones that were quite similar to their first suggestions.
This isn’t to say that firms should never try to crowdsource value creation in an attempt to engage customers. It can be a viable strategy—but managers must understand the high probability of misbehavior. They need to monitor engagement activities continuously and intervene if customers begin offering too much comedy and too few genuine ideas.
Peter C. Verhoef is a professor, Jenny van Doorn is an associate professor, and Sander F.M. Beckers is a PhD student, at the University of Groningen, in the Netherlands.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Monday, August 19, 2013
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Recent Read: Mobile monetization
http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/30/how-facebook-went-from-sucking-at-mobile-to-killing-in-mobile-in-12-short-months/
A little over a year ago, Facebook was so bad at monetizing mobile that the company tried to hide that fact in its legally required pre-IPO documentation, adding it only days before the company went public. The whole mess contributed to what ended up almost being the worst IPO in a decade and a share price that still hasn’t recovered its IPO heights.
Then a week ago, Facebook announced record earnings and a massive 41 percent of revenue from … mobile.
How did the company turn it around that quick?
“Every single year we’ve heard people say ‘This is the year of mobile,” Nanigans SVP Dan Slagen told me, laughing. “But this is the first time we’ve seen someone come forward and put forward the kind of number that Facebook did.”
Nanigans might be the single biggest conduit of Facebook ads on the planet, managing “nine figures” of annual ad spend. So Slagen knows a little about Facebook and revenue. And he says that Facebook targeting has gotten so good in the last year that “there’s really no excuse for someone seeing your ad who doesn’t want your product.” That’s had a massive impact on Facebook profitability, especially on mobile.
Mobile ad exec Krishna Subramanian agrees.
He’s the CMO of mobile advertising company Velti, and he says the massive shift is due to Facebook’s data-centric approach to products and decisions.
“I don’t think it was luck,” Subramanian told me yesterday. “Facebook executed flawlessly after spending the second half of last year experimenting and looking at all the possibilities of making money in mobile.”
Perhaps most interesting is that Facebook’s mobile revenue has gone through the roof this year at the same time that Google’s mobile earnings have tapered off — in spite of layering in mobile into AdWords, which was supposed to increase click prices but actually did not.
For Slagen, it’s all about creative, targeting, and optimization, which have never been better on Facebook.
“Mobile ad units used to be tiny little banners, but Facebook completely broke through that model,” he said. “Facebook’s mobile ad spot is a massively large ad unit, which has given advertisers a whole new opportunity on mobile.”
“Never seen clickthrough rates this high”
Because Facebook’s mobile ad unit is large, brands can be creative again. Aesthetics and visuals are the first things that grab attention, and there’s plenty of room to add a title and some copy — perhaps a call to action. Add in Facebook’s unparalleled targeting capability, and you’ve got a winner, advertisers say — and profitable winner.“We’ve never seen clickthrough rates this high outside of Google Adwords,” Slagen says.
Read more at http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/30/how-facebook-went-from-sucking-at-mobile-to-killing-in-mobile-in-12-short-months/#qOHulv9FPTyVRTdk.99
When Apps meet cloud storage: Upcoming trends?
quick snippet:
While both announcements garnered their fair share of press attention, most failed to notice that these developments are only the tip of the iceberg with respect to the tectonic shifts afoot in the cloud computing space.
This integration of consumer cloud storage with the applications represents an interesting trend — one that Filepicker.io, my company, has been actively catalyzing and aggressively pushing forth on for a while now.
So what are these tectonic shifts, and what does it means to enterprise and independent developers, as well as ultimately to users?
The Death of Local Storage
Notice that both the Dropbox and the Google Drive developments are a marriage of storage with applications. Users are increasingly storing their content online in platforms and that means the death of local storage is near.
Facebook has become my defacto online photo hard drive, while friends with DSLRs use Picasa or Flickr for this purpose. I’ve passively collected a lot of family photos and work PDFs in Gmail. Evernote stores my memories. Google Docs, Box, Alfresco and Office Live have my documents. Even Youtube or Vimeo keeps a cache of my favorite videos. Users don’t realize it fully yet but the content you care about lives online now.
Recent Read: Amazon upending retail and Bezos
http://www.fastcompany.com/3014817/amazon-jeff-bezos
Amazon upended retail, but CEO Jeff Bezos -- who just bought The Washington Post for $250 million -- insists it’s still "Day One." What comes next? A relentless pursuit of cheaper goods and faster shipping. The competition is already gasping for breath.
The first thing you notice about Jeff Bezos is how he strides into a room.
A surprisingly diminutive figure, clad in blue jeans and a blue pinstripe button-down, Bezos flings open the door with an audible whoosh and instantly commands the space with his explosive voice, boisterous manner, and a look of total confidence. "How are you?" he booms, in a way that makes it sound like both a question and a high-decibel announcement
Each of the dozen buildings on Amazon's Seattle campus is named for a milestone in the company's history--Wainwright, for instance, honors its first customer. Bezos and I meet in a six-floor structure known as Day One North. The name means far more than the fact that Amazon, like every company in the universe, opened on a certain date (in this case, it's July 16, 1995). No, Day One is a central motivating idea for Bezos, who has been reminding the public since his first letter to shareholders in 1997 that we are only at Day One in the development of both the Internet and his ambitious retail enterprise. In one recent update for shareholders he went so far as to assert, with typical I-know-something-you-don't flair, that "the alarm clock hasn't even gone off yet." So I ask Bezos: "What exactly does the rest of day one look like?" He pauses to think, then exclaims, "We're still asleep at that!"
AmazonFresh Is Jeff Bezos' Last Mile Quest For Total Retail Domination
Amazon upended retail, but CEO Jeff Bezos -- who just bought The Washington Post for $250 million -- insists it’s still "Day One." What comes next? A relentless pursuit of cheaper goods and faster shipping. The competition is already gasping for breath.
The first thing you notice about Jeff Bezos is how he strides into a room.
A surprisingly diminutive figure, clad in blue jeans and a blue pinstripe button-down, Bezos flings open the door with an audible whoosh and instantly commands the space with his explosive voice, boisterous manner, and a look of total confidence. "How are you?" he booms, in a way that makes it sound like both a question and a high-decibel announcement
Each of the dozen buildings on Amazon's Seattle campus is named for a milestone in the company's history--Wainwright, for instance, honors its first customer. Bezos and I meet in a six-floor structure known as Day One North. The name means far more than the fact that Amazon, like every company in the universe, opened on a certain date (in this case, it's July 16, 1995). No, Day One is a central motivating idea for Bezos, who has been reminding the public since his first letter to shareholders in 1997 that we are only at Day One in the development of both the Internet and his ambitious retail enterprise. In one recent update for shareholders he went so far as to assert, with typical I-know-something-you-don't flair, that "the alarm clock hasn't even gone off yet." So I ask Bezos: "What exactly does the rest of day one look like?" He pauses to think, then exclaims, "We're still asleep at that!"
Recent Read: Inside the mind of Bezos (old 2004 article)
That morning in March 2003, while carrying the richest and arguably most renowned passenger of his long career, Cheater nearly lost control of the copter in the powerful winds. He brought it to a quick landing, but the main rotor sliced into a cedar tree. The airframe split, and the helicopter rolled over and finally settled in the shallow waters of Calamity Creek. The copter was destroyed, but its passengers used their cell phones to call for help, and the U.S. Border Patrol sent a rescue party.
One year later, back at Amazon.com's headquarters in Seattle, Bezos shows no sign of the minor head laceration he was hospitalized for -- and no emotional trauma either. "People say that your life races before your eyes," he says. "This particular accident happened slowly enough that we had a few seconds to contemplate it." He lets out one of his famously booming laughs. Bezos's laugh is like a streak of exclamation points. He laughs much the way a businessman from an earlier era might have slapped your back or pounded the table. But it's a backslap that would break three of your ribs, and a table-pounding that might chop a wooden desk in half like a bravura karate stunt.
"I have to say, nothing extremely profound flashed through my head in those few seconds. My main thought was, This is such a silly way to die." He laughs and laughs and laughs. "It wasn't life-changing in any major way. I've learned a fairly tactical lesson from it, I'm afraid. The biggest takeaway is: Avoid helicopters whenever possible! They're not as reliable as fixed-wing aircraft." Then he laughs hysterically, as though his brush with death were the funniest thing imaginable.
It's tempting but too facile to dismiss Bezos as a guy enjoying a charmed life. His boundless optimism is matched only by his outrageous good luck. The chopper accident was just the latest hairy episode he has survived in nine years as founder and chief executive officer of Amazon. Back in 1997, when the book barons at Barnes & Noble launched their rival Web site, Forrester Research chief George Colony famously predicted that Bezos's little venture was "Amazon.toast." A lot of people in the press and on Wall Street -- and inside the company as well -- thought the critic was correct. But Bezos flourished. Later, when the collective delusion of the 1990s finally ended, Amazon's shares fell from $100 to $6. Bezos remained sanguine. "Jeff irrepressibly casts every challenge as an opportunity," says his longtime friend Linda Stone, a former executive at Apple and Microsoft.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)